Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/04/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi Richard, I use Leica-R lenses on my Olympus E-1. Is there a lot of difference between the Summicron-R and the Summicron-M design? Jim Nichols Tullahoma, TN USA ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Taylor" <r.s.taylor at comcast.net> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org> Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 9:42 AM Subject: Re: [Leica] M Lenses on GF-1 > The best way to think about this is to think of each pixel as a tiny > bucket with steep sides and the light sensitive area at the bottom. Light > must go straight in in order to be detected. Light arriving at anything > other than almost straight in is either lost or scattered. > > That's why the sensors in the M8 and M9 have the offset lenses on top of > the sensor. > They allow the sensor to respond better to the off-axis light coming out > of M-type lenses. > > SLR lenses are usually retrofocus designs that send the light close to > straight in to the sensors and therefore work better on the micro 4-3rds > cameras than M lenses do. > > Dick > > (Who works with sensors like these in the infrared for space missions.) > > > > On Apr 15, 2010, at 9:17 AM, Simon Ogilvie wrote: > >>> I'm also perplexed at how Contax G lenses can be materially better on >>> Micro Four Thirds than are Leica M lenses, or even CV lenses for that >>> matter. While I haven't used all on Micro Four Thirds I have used them >>> all on film and for the most part they're all pretty good. Thus I'm >>> curious as to why the performance would be so different on Micro Four >>> Thirds. What kind of adapters are you using? >> >> I agree - one of the primary reasons I bought into the 4/3 system was >> because it allowed me to use my Leica M (and Voigtlander) lenses which >> don't see much use any more as I shoot very little film these days. >> The results using these lenses were very disappointing. The Panasonic >> 14-45 covers the range of nearly all of my M lenses anyway, so as the >> results seem better and it's much more convenient to use, I stick with >> the zoom. I was surprised that the results from the Contax G lenses >> looked so much nicer. Why this is the case when the Leica lenses are >> so nice with film I cannot explain. The adapters are the Voigtlander >> one for the Leica-M lenses, and an adapter imported from Hong Kong for >> the Contax G with a little manual focus wheel that engages with the >> focussing drive on the lenses. >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > >