Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/04/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] two questions for the LUGger expertise
From: hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson)
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:01:51 +1000
References: <w2m19b6d42d1004142233zab58c530wada2766741103218@mail.gmail.com> <m2lb530ac231004142303pb222f365s9441bbb67d277190@mail.gmail.com> <r2l19b6d42d1004142319xa937394tf2721586c702b67f@mail.gmail.com>

Vince while you are being confused and angry on 'crop factor' terminology
you can add Depth of Field to your stressors. See the Zeiss article recently
linked.


Cheers
Geoff
http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman


On 15 April 2010 16:19, Vince Passaro <passaro.vince at gmail.com> wrote:

> But it's not easy to understand, in my opinion. Because if someone starts
> saying how great it is when he/she puts a 135 on the m4/3 they're getting a
> 270mm picture I get confused and angry, like a hungry overtired child....
> know what I mean?
>
> Thanks though for the clear answer.
>
> V
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 2:03 AM, Daniel Tan <taniel.dan at gmail.com> 
> wrote:
>
> > On 15 April 2010 15:33, Vince Passaro <passaro.vince at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > 2. A less simple question: the ongoing thread about Leica lenses on the
> > GF1
> > > began with some commentary that included language that depicted using
> the
> > > 50/1.4 on the GF1 as having a "100/1.4" lens on the camera. I see this
> > all
> > > the time, the equation of the half crop with a lens twice as long. But
> > > isn't
> > > what one has really a 50mm image with a 25% crop off all four sides?
> And
> > a
> > > slightly narrower (more tele) angle of view? Please correct me in
> however
> > > I've gotten this wrong.  But I'm pretty sure that having a half-sized
> > > sensor
> > > is not the same as putting a 2x converter on a full frame. It doesn't
> > yield
> > > the same image at all. Why do people say this?
> > >
> > >
> > yes, you're correct, all you're doing is cropping a 50mm picture to have
> > the
> > same FOV as a 100.
> >
> > People use it because it's convenient. And easy to understand.
> >
> > I sit there and scratch my head trying to figure out what the FOV of a
> 65mm
> > lens on a 6x6 is. But if someone told me that it was equivalent to a 35mm
> > on
> > 135 then I would understand.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


In reply to: Message from passaro.vince at gmail.com (Vince Passaro) ([Leica] two questions for the LUGger expertise)
Message from taniel.dan at gmail.com (Daniel Tan) ([Leica] two questions for the LUGger expertise)
Message from passaro.vince at gmail.com (Vince Passaro) ([Leica] two questions for the LUGger expertise)