Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/04/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I don't doubt what you're saying. I'm just a bit mystified how a lens can vignette on a sensor that's half the size of film that it was designed to cover. That hasn't been my experience with M lenses on Micro Four Thirds. I actually have to use Lightroom to add a little forced vignetting because in many cases I like that look. I'm also perplexed at how Contax G lenses can be materially better on Micro Four Thirds than are Leica M lenses, or even CV lenses for that matter. While I haven't used all on Micro Four Thirds I have used them all on film and for the most part they're all pretty good. Thus I'm curious as to why the performance would be so different on Micro Four Thirds. What kind of adapters are you using? The main issues I see in using Lumix lenses versus Leica M lenses on the GF-1 is that Lumix lenses have AF and Leica M lenses don't. It's easy to miss focus, particularly with the longer lenses wide open. A focus assist LED in the viewfinder would be a nice feature to have. Dave R -----Original Message----- From: lug-bounces+drodgers=casefarms.com at leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+drodgers=casefarms.com at leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Simon Ogilvie Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 3:03 PM To: lug at leica-users.org Subject: Re: [Leica] M Lenses on GF-1 I've used a variety of Leica and Voigtlander M lenses on a G1, and also a couple of Contax G lenses (45/2 and 90/2.8). Without exception I found the M lenses disappointing with either smearing, vignetting or other faults. The Contax G lenses however are superb on the micro 4/3 format and I much prefer the 90 to the 90 Summicron and the 45 to my (now sold) 50 Summilux. I've also been a bit disappointed with the performance of the Panasonic 45-200. I haven't checked but it's possible most of the shots I've taken have been at or close to full aperture, so the vignetting at the long end is very noticeable. It also doesn't appear very sharp at the long end either. Maybe the upcoming 100-300 will be better - I hope so. _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information