Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/04/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]In general I would agree with you, but IS can also be quite good with moving subjects as most subjects have moments when action peaks or there is a momentary pause. I've found that very often those are also the moments that I like to capture, due to expressions or other compositional concerns. Sometimes a shot at 1/125 at f/1.4 might be better handled by an f/4 lens with IS at 1/15, even when the subject is generally moving. A higher shutter speed can cover some errors in handling; dof can cover others. Fast lenses and IS both have their advantages, and not always with moving/stationary subjects. Different technique is required, but both can often be effectively used with either type of subject, in my experience. BTW, I find that the IS on most current lenses gives you an advantage of about 3 stops for a similar blur level, with the best system giving you about 4 stops. Again, technique is important and you have to practice a while. At 5:45 AM +0200 4/14/10, Nathan Wajsman wrote: >If the subject is moving, no amount of IS will help. That is why I >am generally an IS sceptic, since I tend to photograph people and >not statues. > >Nathan > >Nathan Wajsman >Alicante, Spain >http://www.frozenlight.eu >http://www.greatpix.eu >http://www.nathanfoto.com > >Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0 >PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws >Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog > > > > > > >On Apr 14, 2010, at 3:28 AM, Vince Passaro wrote: > >> >> I keep thinking that the 14-45 is slow, which nominally it is, but then >> again I always have to remind myself that unlike the MF lenses I enjoy >> using >> with the G1, the Lumix 14-45 has IS so can be hand held at much longer >> shutter speeds -- my guess is it compensates a step-and-a-half at least, >> which means it's more like an f2 - f3.5 spread in terms of the light >> conditions it can handle than the nominal 3.5-5.6. Any opinions on that? >> >> Vince > > >_______________________________________________ >Leica Users Group. >See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information -- * Henning J. Wulff /|\ Wulff Photography & Design /###\ mailto:henningw at archiphoto.com |[ ]| http://www.archiphoto.com