Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/04/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Wow, the last word on bokeh, from Zeiss
From: jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols)
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 17:48:31 -0500
References: <380-2201041122265299@M2W111.mail2web.com> <A54CE47B-91A3-403C-BC19-447B9B41FA37@gmail.com>

Good, Bad, and Ugly ARE the attributes.

Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jeffery Smith" <jsmith342 at gmail.com>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 5:38 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Wow, the last word on bokeh, from Zeiss


> IF there can be good bokeh, bad bokeh, and ugly bokeh, then they must have 
> different attributes. Can't be an all or nothing.
>
> Jeffery
>
> On Apr 12, 2010, at 5:06 PM, wildlightphoto at earthlink.net wrote:
>
>> Marty Deveney wrote:
>>
>>>>>
>> they have misdefined bokeh.  It's not the "attributes of the
>> blur", it _is_ the blur.
>> <<<
>>
>> My understanding is that it's the attributes of the blur.
>>
>> Doug Herr
>> Birdman of Sacramento
>> http://www.wildlightphoto.com
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>> mail2web.com - Microsoft? Exchange solutions from a leading provider -
>> http://link.mail2web.com/Business/Exchange
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> 




Replies: Reply from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] Wow, the last word on bokeh, from Zeiss)
In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (wildlightphoto at earthlink.net) ([Leica] Wow, the last word on bokeh, from Zeiss)
Message from jsmith342 at gmail.com (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] Wow, the last word on bokeh, from Zeiss)