[Leica] 3.5 cm. Elmar

Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/04/09

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] 3.5 cm. Elmar
From: s.dimitrov at charter.net (slobodan Dimitrov)
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 20:27:23 -0700
References: <C7E4F55D.6100B%mark@rabinergroup.com> <2786BA03-D291-4624-84B6-AA860C62F52F@usjet.net> <u2vdaaeb97e1004091351y8dfdf1cm761523585d579911@mail.gmail.com> <p2w19b6d42d1004091553rdc804b86ha8b565b90c924932@mail.gmail.com>

I believe that coating was standard as of 1946. 
S.d.


On Apr 9, 2010, at 3:53 PM, Vince Passaro wrote:

> Anyway -- is this equipment (lens first I guess) worth saving? Anyone know
> if a 1948-1951 era Summar is coated or not?

Replies: Reply from passaro.vince at gmail.com (Vince Passaro) ([Leica] 3.5 cm. Elmar)
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] 3.5 cm. Elmar)
Message from robertmeier at usjet.net (Robert Meier) ([Leica] 3.5 cm. Elmar)
Message from digiratidoc at gmail.com (James Laird) ([Leica] 3.5 cm. Elmar)
Message from passaro.vince at gmail.com (Vince Passaro) ([Leica] 3.5 cm. Elmar)