Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/04/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] WikiLeaks
From: steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour)
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 22:48:54 -0700
References: <B1BDEE6C-2CCA-455E-994D-9443729166AC@gmail.com> <t2z36172e5a1004051941zdefd2d54w7bb68cd4347904af@mail.gmail.com>
 
On Apr 5, 2010, at 7:41 PM, Geoff Hopkinson wrote:

> In my opinion this is inappropriate for the LUG.

good old fashioned photo journalism in progress,

Steve

> 
> Cheers
> Geoff
> http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman
> 
> 
> On 6 April 2010 11:06, Steve Barbour <steve.barbour at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> http://wikileaks.org/
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
Replies: Reply from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] WikiLeaks)
 In reply to: Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] WikiLeaks)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] WikiLeaks)