Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/04/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Check out the elegant little Panasonic 14-45 micro 4/3 zoom. With OIS and an 'on/off' switch on the side. I cannot say enough good stuff about this zoom lens (I'm generally not a fan of zoom lenses either). It's great, which is probably why they're changing it (I'm certain for the worse). On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 8:01 AM, Jeffery Smith <jsmith342 at gmail.com> wrote: > Got it. I was under the impression that it was in the body. I usually > associate VR in lenses with those enormous Nikon lenses on dSLR cameras. > > Jeffery > > > On Apr 2, 2010, at 11:53 PM, Vince Passaro wrote: > > > Jeffery: > > It's not that IS "doesn't work" in the Pana GF-1 with the 20mm lens: it > > doesn't exist. Panasonic puts it in the lenses but not in a lens that > small. > > Olympus puts it in the body. > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Jeffery Smith <jsmith342 at gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >>> From what I gather, the image stabilization doesn't work on the > Panasonic > >> GF-1 with the 20/1.7 pancake. But I agree with you. And it seems like a > >> sounder idea to move the sensor rather than shifting the position of > >> elements in the lens. > >> > >> Jeffery > >> > >>> Sonny Carter wrote: > >>> > >>>> I enjoy having the stabilization in the body because it affects ALL > the > >>>> lenses I put on the camera. > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Leica Users Group. > >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >