Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/03/31

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] New Digital (?) Rangefinder Rumor
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 11:12:18 -0500
References: <8C79F0A2-BA46-4C73-850B-8E614FD4FE56@mac.com> <C7D84DE5.60672%mark@rabinergroup.com> <00de01cad090$7836dd50$68a497f0$@net> <78F55A97-D4BE-402B-95A8-6A20244C93F2@mac.com> <004d01cad0de$ce66ef50$6b34cdf0$@net>

I take your point well Frank.
Which is why I'm trying to keep my end of the discussion
on my own subjective assessment of the systems I've used.

Yet, no one has offered an answer as to:
why do the the high end medium format back manufacturers choose to  
use CCD's?

The fact that they make that choice leads me to a belief
which is reinforced by my own experience.

To my knowledge the only medium format company that tried Cmos was Leaf
and the back was a total flop that can be picked up for chump change  
on the used market.

Regards,
George Lottermoser
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist

On Mar 31, 2010, at 9:31 AM, Frank Filippone wrote:

> Stick with the comparison of cameras, where the total systems are  
> being
> compared, within the constraints and constructs a user can be  
> allowed to
> change and tweak....
>
> Don't get into a pure CMOS vs CCD discussion.... which I call  
> technological
> drivel talk.....



In reply to: Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] New Digital (?) Rangefinder Rumor)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] New Digital (?) Rangefinder Rumor)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] New Digital (?) Rangefinder Rumor)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] New Digital (?) Rangefinder Rumor)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] New Digital (?) Rangefinder Rumor)