Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/03/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] New Digital (?) Rangefinder Rumor
From: passaro.vince at gmail.com (Vince Passaro)
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 23:07:37 -0400
References: <C7D6F0F3.604FC%mark@rabinergroup.com> <5A54644D-8E68-4F33-80EE-FEC834856639@mac.com> <ee8fa51c1003301503m50f4f14bh4361a7799dfb3cd@mail.gmail.com> <36B3FAF9-0E98-478B-9B31-E59E2C15CE04@mac.com> <ee8fa51c1003301531x3171e0d7o76d28f8e35391996@mail.gmail.com> <AC60147C-9790-4B80-BBF6-010DCB67EBF6@mac.com> <00d101cad07b$f6951280$e3bf3780$@net> <b530ac231003301955l27b67facgdc59bc996067a9bd@mail.gmail.com>

So as it turns out in practice do they consistently look different or not?

On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 10:55 PM, Daniel Tan <taniel.dan at gmail.com> wrote:

> That's completely correct. Case in point: That 6MP Sony sensor that made it
> into the D70, *ist D, Maxxum 7D, RD1(?), etc, etc...
>
> Daniel Tan, Electrical Engineer...
>
> On 31 March 2010 12:43, Frank Filippone <red735i at earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> > OK.. let's try to straighten this out.....
> >
> > Digi-cameras are systems.  They contain a sensor, some following HW, then
> > some SW/FW, then are transported magically to your computer where some
> more
> > SW is used to give you an "image".  You view that image on a CRT, LCD, or
> > print ( or something else, irrelevant).  That display element is also
> > connected to a computer of sorts with its SW/FW or whatever you wish to
> > call
> > it.
> >
> > You can not separate out the sensor as better or worse.  They are part of
> > the total system.  Dependent on the manufacturers'  efforts, you will get
> > DIFFERENT results from different sensors, FW, SW, Display, Computer
> program
> > FW and SW, etc.
> >
> > You see differences because the systems are designed with different goals
> > and constraints.
> >
> > Say that you prefer the results of the Canon D1xMk9 ( or whatever) over
> the
> > Nikon D700V3 when used on a single display and a single program on your
> > computer .and I can accept that.  You prefer that total system.
> >
> > Say that a CMOS sensor is not as good as or different to a CCD sensor is
> > useless drivel-talk.
> >
> >
> > Frank Filippone, ex-Electrical Engineer
> > red735i at earthlink.net
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] New Digital (?) Rangefinder Rumor)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] New Digital (?) Rangefinder Rumor)
Message from benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney) ([Leica] New Digital (?) Rangefinder Rumor)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] New Digital (?) Rangefinder Rumor)
Message from benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney) ([Leica] New Digital (?) Rangefinder Rumor)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] New Digital (?) Rangefinder Rumor)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] New Digital (?) Rangefinder Rumor)
Message from taniel.dan at gmail.com (Daniel Tan) ([Leica] New Digital (?) Rangefinder Rumor)