Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/03/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Further Rumors on *that* New RF
From: red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone)
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 19:23:02 -0700
References: <C7D79F23.605B9%mark@rabinergroup.com> <F5694015-DCA0-473B-87F9-6BCFD434A842@comcast.net> <EC093803-A43D-4A2A-B417-FA0CE8B89F96@frozenlight.eu> <5EC9B628-2079-4ED2-8F22-805C508BCBCE@comcast.net> <697A3A1A2B38456C9AD1C8FBDFB8B777@qck8vqhgou8blu> <781598F2-DC4B-48C2-94EF-2C0FCD16487E@comcast.net> <i2w19b6d42d1003301902kdfd118d3h66e3cc556d439bae@mail.gmail.com>
 
Why do you say this?

We, the assembled multitude, have NO idea the cost of components for
cameras.  For all we know, the correct choice of FF sensor may be less cost
than the 2/3 or 1/2 or whatever sensors we now have.....  If company XYZ
gets a hair in the wrong place, they will want to take market share, and do
it by cutting the cost to the camera makers.....

Don't bet on anything WRT costs ......

Frank Filippone
red735i at earthlink.net


The other possibility is that wit will not be full frame, which will bring
down the cost even further.
Replies: Reply from passaro.vince at gmail.com (Vince Passaro) ([Leica] Further Rumors on *that* New RF)
 In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Further Rumors on *that* New RF)
Message from r.s.taylor at comcast.net (Richard Taylor) ([Leica] Further Rumors on *that* New RF)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Further Rumors on *that* New RF)
Message from r.s.taylor at comcast.net (Richard Taylor) ([Leica] Further Rumors on *that* New RF)
Message from alal at poly.edu (A. Lal) ([Leica] Further Rumors on *that* New RF)
Message from r.s.taylor at comcast.net (Richard Taylor) ([Leica] Further Rumors on *that* New RF)
Message from passaro.vince at gmail.com (Vince Passaro) ([Leica] Further Rumors on *that* New RF)