Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/03/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Right you are, sad to say. ;-( Regards, Dick On Mar 30, 2010, at 4:51 PM, George Lottermoser wrote: > or even $7K > > ;~) > > Regards, > George Lottermoser > george at imagist.com > http://www.imagist.com > http://www.imagist.com/blog > http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist > > On Mar 30, 2010, at 12:18 PM, Richard Taylor wrote: > >> Can't we all. Of course, this little gem might still cost $5K! >> >> Regards, >> >> Dick >> >> >> >> On Mar 30, 2010, at 12:29 PM, Mark Rabiner wrote: >> >>>> See: >>>> >>>> http://photorumors.com/ >>>> >>>> "The standard lens is suppose to be 35mm f/1.2 and there are two more >>>> lenses. >>>> The rangefinder is full frame with magnesium alloy electronic shutter >>>> and >>>> supposedly with very good AF (I guess this will not be a classic manual >>>> focus >>>> rangefinder)." >>>> >>>> It would be nice if this was true, wouldn't it? >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Dick >>>> >>> >>> If I can dream. >>> >>> [Rabs] >>> Mark William Rabiner >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Leica Users Group. >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information