Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/03/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Help to decide
From: philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard)
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 20:00:36 +0200
References: <AD083EAA-2221-4BC1-9380-FB810BA72F42@gmail.com> <44600F75-7B64-4415-8509-9B448971B98F@mac.com>
 
I support this.

Plus, the opening to the lighter zone gives depth to it.

The geometry of the first one is more attractive though.

Good on you Lluis.

Amiti?s
Philippe


Le 30 mars 10 ? 19:35, George Lottermoser a ?crit :

>
> seems to have much more life and wetness in it
> therefore my preference
>
> Regards,
> George Lottermoser
> george at imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com/blog
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
>
> On Mar 28, 2010, at 5:37 PM, Lluis Ripoll Querol wrote:
>
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/El_Raval/2010020121.jpg.html
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
Replies: Reply from lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll Querol) ([Leica] Help to decide)
 In reply to: Message from lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll Querol) ([Leica] Help to decide)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Help to decide)