Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/03/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] three questions: C41 b/w film; Mamiya DM22; why no US version of GF1 w 20mm kit?
From: steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour)
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 20:07:56 -0700
References: <19b6d42d1003272213l512b02f2m2f28f7ddcd82d132@mail.gmail.com> <4BB1575D.9010500@cox.net> <19b6d42d1003292005i232b2aa2oe312204e8a044fba@mail.gmail.com>

On Mar 29, 2010, at 8:05 PM, Vince Passaro wrote:

> I lvoe Tri X but cannot process it myself and find it increasingly 
> expensive
> to have it done. The C41s can be done anywhere by anybody and put on disk.
> That's why I'm asking people's opinions.

C41bw is terrific for the reasons stated, what's to ask ?...

it's clear,


Steve



> 
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 9:43 PM, Ken Carney <kcarney1 at cox.net> wrote:
> 
>> On 3/28/2010 12:13 AM, Vince Passaro wrote:
>> 
>>> I'm contemplating C41 b and w film. I've used the Kodak and liked it
>>> sometimes and not others (dependong on factors I was too ignorant to 
>>> learn
>>> how to control at the time, I suspect). My impression though was that
>>> Koday
>>> was the best of them but I do recollect an Ilford that some people
>>> liked...
>>> perhaps it was that 50 ASA of theirs?
>>> 
>>> Anyone using C41 and feel knowledgeable and opinionated enough to declare
>>> differences and preferences?
>>> 
>>> Or, here's another question:
>>> 
>>> I see on B&H site that there's a Mamiya medium format digital camera for
>>> under $10K, called the DM22. Anyone know about it, have an opinon, etc?
>>> for
>>> the price it comes with an 80mm lens, which I guess is kind of an
>>> equivalent
>>> to normal size lens?
>>> 
>>> And finally: among you GF1 fanatics out there -- does anyone know why you
>>> can buy the GF! with the 20mm as a kit in Europe but, after a brief
>>> availablility, not here? (here being the good ole' US of A folks. TGeam
>>> America. Burn the camera in order to save it. Semper Fi. all that.)_
>>> 
>>> Thanks
>>> 
>>> Vince
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> The Kodak C41 film scans very well, and that is a good thing because it
>> will not last that long as a film negative.  Plus, you can use digital ICE
>> with the C41 films.  I never had much luck printing either the Kodak or
>> Ilford C41 films in the darkroom.   That is TriX etc. territory.  If I had
>> to go back to film, I would try Kodak C41 if available and a pro lab to
>> process.  Remember that if circumstances permit you can bracket ISO's with
>> these films and likely come up with something you will like.
>> 
>> Ken Carney
>> Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] three questions: C41 b/w film; Mamiya DM22; why no US version of GF1 w 20mm kit?)
Reply from passaro.vince at gmail.com (Vince Passaro) ([Leica] three questions: C41 b/w film; Mamiya DM22; why no US version of GF1 w 20mm kit?)
In reply to: Message from passaro.vince at gmail.com (Vince Passaro) ([Leica] three questions: C41 b/w film; Mamiya DM22; why no US version of GF1 w 20mm kit?)
Message from kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney) ([Leica] three questions: C41 b/w film; Mamiya DM22; why no US version of GF1 w 20mm kit?)
Message from passaro.vince at gmail.com (Vince Passaro) ([Leica] three questions: C41 b/w film; Mamiya DM22; why no US version of GF1 w 20mm kit?)