Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/03/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] [img] portrait without a face
From: al.crouch at earthlink.net (al.crouch at earthlink.net)
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 15:10:39 -0500
 
If a wildflower can have a portrait    
http://www.texaswildflowerpictures.com/wildflower_p.htm
Surely the backside of a person would qualify as well.  

I am curious about the small glowing artifacts in the air, inside the
railing and on the dress.   How were those made?

:Al Crouch


> [Original Message]
> From: Kyle Cassidy <kcassidy at asc.upenn.edu>
> To: lug at leica-users.org <lug at leica-users.org>
> Date: 3/24/2010 9:40:32 AM
> Subject: [Leica] [img] portrait without a face
>
> another portrait from this weekend in San Diego, hopefully representative
of my style and pleasing to the subjects at the same time.
>
> http://www.kylecassidy.com/lj/2010/san-diego-spin.jpg
>
> What are your thoughts on a portrait that doesn't even show the faces of
the subjects? is it still a portrait?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information