Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/03/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] LUG Digest, Vol 44, Issue 211
From: passaro.vince at gmail.com (Vince Passaro)
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 11:39:05 -0400
References: <mailman.1402.1269211231.1001.lug@leica-users.org> <E836A4E108B549C9AE359C6293DA6B23@SueHome>

We did cars. They've stayed remarkably close to CPI.  Whereas Leicas, not so
much. But not too bad. Not like housing.

On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Sue Pearce <bs.pearce at cox.net> wrote:

> I have the November 1955 Leica Product Directory.
>>>
>>> Catalog    Code
>>> Number    Word                       Item Retail Price
>>> ******    ******    ********************************        ********
>>> 10,150    IGEMO    Leica M 3 without lens $288.00
>>> 10,155    IMARO    Leica M 3 with 50mm Elmar f/3.5 lens 348.00
>>> 10,161    ISUMO    Leica M 3 with 50mm Summicron f/2 lens
>>> 447.00
>>> 10,165    ISAIO      Leica M 3 with 50mm Summarit f/1.5 lens 468.00
>>>
>>>  An interesting exercise would be to compare the costs of other consumer
> goods from the same time, such as refrigerators or new cars or TV's. I
> suspect that the costs might be closer that you expect.
>
> Bill Pearce
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


In reply to: Message from bs.pearce at cox.net (Sue Pearce) ([Leica] LUG Digest, Vol 44, Issue 211)