Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/03/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Many many thanks to all for comments and pointers. I profile you all and do some levels too with much affection and admiration. Now I want to catalogue you all and send you to the web. Speaking of which, here's another weird thing: whenever I open Flickr now, it's in Chinese. I musta hit something but I don't know what. On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Vince Passaro <passaro.vince at gmail.com>wrote: > But can you not do in Adobe Bridge what you say you can do in LR? It > appears you can process raw files and adjust them, though I haven't figured > out quite *how *yet. But I've read you can. And you can definitely batch > and label and keyword and organize.... I ask in order to save myself > another 100 bucks. > > On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 12:59 AM, Henning Wulff <henningw at > archiphoto.com>wrote:P >> >> >> LR and PS use the same basic engine, ie, Adobe Camera Raw to process raw >> files, but they have a completely different interface and audience. >> >> PS is for people (and their images) who want to work on one image at a >> time, and do lots of things to it. >> >> LR is for people who shoot a lot of photos, want to organize them into >> topics, groups, etc and want to quickly sort through them, pick the good >> ones and batcvh process them in a more 'photographer' intuitive way. >> Almost >> always LR is better for photographers and PS is more for graphic >> designers, >> or for final finishes on a special photograph that LR doesn't have all the >> tools for. In that sense PS augments LR, but in LR you can process 50 >> photos >> for most parameters in the time that you can do 1 photo in PS, and you >> have >> a good database as well. >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > >