Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/03/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]> "Doug Herr" <wildlightphoto at earthlink.net> wrote >> I believe part of the problem is that we have much better access to >> information than in years past. Child abduction and pedophilia are not >> new; what's new is that with near-instant access to events in many parts >> of the world we can now hear of many more incidents than in the past. The >> number or rate of these crimes may or may not have changed, but access to >> information about them certainly has changed. >> > > I agree. With the burst of publicity that now attends the revelation of > such > crimes, it's even likely that they've reduced in areas where press freedom > rules. For instance, it's extremely likely those in dog collars are > probably > keeping their hands in their pockets a bit more than they used to. > > More of this type of discussion is available on the "LUG forum: for > off-topic arguments" and arguments rage a-plenty there! > > Douglas > _________ > Douglas Barry > Bray, Co. Wicklow > Republic of Ireland > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information Although freedom of speech and freedom of the press: the FIRST AMENDMENT if you are here in the USA is not a periphery issue to those with a serious interest in the pursuit of photography. It's the bottom line. There is no "we don't like this guy" or this fella is going to post kids on the swing-set to a website" so the first amendment has to go this time. That is way far out absurdity. [Rabs] Mark William Rabiner