Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/03/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]She is mortified and humiliated by her bare legs showing in a photo shoot where she is clearly half naked, but readily admits to jumping into bed with a married man who has a dying wife within hours of first meeting him. That photo shoot is the only thing that has made her look "good" in the past 4 years. And I imagine that she was paid for it as well. Jeffery On Mar 17, 2010, at 8:07 AM, slobodan Dimitrov wrote: > She's completely out of her depth. Not too surprising, most manipulators > hardly ever see when they are out manipulated themselves. I suspect she > though that this was a PR thing for her, whereas GQ was merely doing its > editorial thing, for their own reasons, not hers. > S.d. > > On Mar 16, 2010, at 1:46 PM, Kyle Cassidy wrote: > >> George sed: >> >>> agreeing to a photo shoot for GQ >>> (and signing a Release before the shoot;... >>> sort of negate any potential post-shoot beefs? >> >> I do agree. The photo I've seen from the GQ shoot looked an awful lot >> like the video tape. It can't be that she didn't know what they were >> going to look like - she's on the set, _wearing no pants_ and it's for >> _GQ_ -- it's not like Jill Greeberg's malicious post-processing of John >> McCain. I haven't read her complaints, so I'm only speculating, but from >> what I saw of that video and the final shot, it looks like she knew what >> was going on. And like someone else pointed out, she's not a political or >> media novice. And I don't think the photos are unflattering at all. >> They're not racy, though they are provocative, which is the sad thing -- >> the connotation of doing a photo shoot like that is specifically to drag >> the John Edwards affair back into the limelight -- which I expect GQ to >> do, it's their job -- but I think "No I won't pose with no pants on, >> thanks for asking" is the appropriate response out of respect for a >> former lover. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information