Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/03/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Digital SLR viewfinders suck.
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 18:04:03 -0600
References: <420887777.9734851268414419283.JavaMail.root@dsmdc-mail-mbs12> <DE4FCC23-CB1A-45FC-95AA-1DA00426A007@mac.com> <19b6d42d1003121340ue5fe012v5ecf9ca3e3ed978a@mail.gmail.com> <A6239578-CFDB-445A-9665-793D25CB19E1@mac.com> <4248CEDE-C4C7-4B55-A2AF-6BC94B70E365@frozenlight.eu>

agreed - love at first touch for me

Regards,
George Lottermoser
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist

On Mar 13, 2010, at 4:21 PM, Nathan Wajsman wrote:

> And in mine when I was shooting film. In fact, the R8 is the most  
> ergonomically correct and comfortable SLR I have ever owned.
>
> Nathan
>
> Nathan Wajsman
> Alicante, Spain
> http://www.frozenlight.eu
> http://www.greatpix.eu
> http://www.nathanfoto.com
>
> Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0
> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
> Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mar 12, 2010, at 11:01 PM, George Lottermoser wrote:
>
>> True enough.
>> Not small.
>> Yet, extremely comfortable
>> in my hands.
>>
>> Regards,
>> George Lottermoser
>> george at imagist.com
>> http://www.imagist.com
>> http://www.imagist.com/blog
>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
>>
>> On Mar 12, 2010, at 3:40 PM, Vince Passaro wrote:
>>
>>> Slightly OT but I just saw my first live R8 today at Adorama and  
>>> the thing
>>> is like the size of a European rental car. Yikes. It appears to  
>>> be double
>>> the volume of my humble R4 Mod P; i.e., my R4 that works.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 12:35 PM, George Lottermoser  
>>> <imagist3 at mac.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> In some way I'm glad that I never looked through a Leica SL VF  
>>>> (view
>>>> finder);
>>>> As it seems one forever sees all others (including R8) lacking.
>>>>
>>>> My only 35mm SLR VF experiences:
>>>> Nikon F
>>>> FtN
>>>> F2
>>>> F5
>>>> N90
>>>> Canon 10D
>>>> 20D
>>>> 5D
>>>> Leica R3
>>>> R8
>>>>
>>>> R8 wins in that line up with a very significant lead.
>>>>
>>>> So I feel very happy in my ignorance,
>>>> continuing to feel I have the best available Digital SLR VF.
>>>>
>>>> ;~)
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> George Lottermoser
>>>> george at imagist.com
>>>> http://www.imagist.com
>>>> http://www.imagist.com/blog
>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mar 12, 2010, at 11:20 AM, grduprey at mchsi.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The F's mirror assembly is far superior to the current Nikon  
>>>> Line, very
>>>>> well built and far quieter than the current Nikon line, Period.
>>>>>
>>>>> As for Viewfinder brightness, I'm with Doug, SL #1, then the  
>>>>> R8.  the rest
>>>>> just don't cut it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Gene
>>>>>
>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> From: Doug Herr <wildlightphoto at earthlink.net>
>>>>> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>>>>> Sent: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:46:24 -0600 (CST)
>>>>> Subject: Re: [Leica] Digital SLR viewfinders suck.
>>>>>
>>>>> Chris Williams wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> So we need a D3 body and an F VF? I'll go along with that. I've  
>>>>> seen
>>>>>> people
>>>>>> pound nails with the bottom of the D3 on youtube.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> An SL viewfinder would be better.  The F viewfinder's pretty  
>>>>> good though.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Doug Herr
>>>>> Birdman of Sacramento
>>>>> http://www.wildlightphoto.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more  
>>>>> information
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more  
>>>>> information
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more  
>>>> information
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from tcharara at mac.com (Tarek Charara) ([Leica] Digital SLR viewfinders suck.)
In reply to: Message from grduprey at mchsi.com (grduprey at mchsi.com) ([Leica] Digital SLR viewfinders suck.)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Digital SLR viewfinders suck.)
Message from passaro.vince at gmail.com (Vince Passaro) ([Leica] Digital SLR viewfinders suck.)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Digital SLR viewfinders suck.)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Digital SLR viewfinders suck.)