Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/03/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Which doesn't mean there are no taxes over here ... rather ... and it is a well known fact Ph in taxland Le 10 mars 10 ? 07:12, Nathan Wajsman a ?crit : > > Nicolas is in Paris, so all this US tax talk is irrelevant in the > context of his question. > > Cheers, > Nathan > > Nathan Wajsman > Alicante, Spain > http://www.frozenlight.eu > http://www.greatpix.eu > http://www.nathanfoto.com > > Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0 > PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws > Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog > > > > > > > On Mar 10, 2010, at 3:06 AM, Richard Man wrote: > >> That's a rule of thumb, not an actual rule. >> >> If you can argue that you have been trying to run it as a business, >> it's >> fine if you don't make a profit. >> >> Of course, you should definitely consult a tax advisor... >> >> On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Bob Adler <rgacpa at yahoo.com> wrote: >> >>> Rule is once every 5 years you must show a profit. >>> And *always* show every penny of income... >>> But don't quote me; consult your tax advisor... >>> Bob Adler >>> Palo Alto, CA >>> http://www.rgaphoto.com >>> > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >