Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/03/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Adorama vs. B&H backorder policy...and oh yeah, I just ordered an M9
From: passaro.vince at gmail.com (Vince Passaro)
Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2010 18:59:32 -0500
References: <075E202C-99B0-49E6-AA8E-84C45EA77550@bex.net>

Yo Howard

A.) You should write to B & H. They tend to be very customer friendly. I
would assume they don't want to take orders that aren't really orders....
control their inventory?

B.) Where you gettin 6 percent bro? At an annual return of .33 percent,
that's $2.20.

Vince

On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Howard Ritter <hlritter at bex.net> wrote:

> Well, I decided to just do it.
>
> I usually buy from B&H, but on back-orders their practice is to charge the
> buyer's credit card when the order is PLACED.
> Adorama charges only when the item SHIPS.
> I don't want to give anyone use of my $7000 for a few (?) months needlessly
> and for no return (at 6% that's $35/mo).
> Anyone know why B&H is so unfriendly in this respect? Keeping an order
> active in the system until the item's in stock costs them nothing.
> But this practice clearly costs them orders.
>
> ?howard
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


Replies: Reply from kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney) ([Leica] Adorama vs. B&H backorder policy...and oh yeah, I just ordered an M9)
In reply to: Message from hlritter at bex.net (Howard Ritter) ([Leica] Adorama vs. B&H backorder policy...and oh yeah, I just ordered an M9)