Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/03/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Some from a party
From: photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman)
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 21:54:01 +0100
References: <542B34D1-8876-4C45-865B-1E6327A4F003@gmail.com> <025529DC-7016-4701-BD84-7B19F66CF3E3@gmail.com> <36172e5a1003021813p51f2dd1arbbad1e177a5b9cae@mail.gmail.com> <CB448D3A-8409-4831-A92D-528AB9A780D4@frozenlight.eu> <D1EB9FC0-BA40-4E9D-95F2-C92E3A279F94@mac.com>

No disagreement from me, George! Doug's pictures demand technical 
perfection, and he achieves it. And certainly, even when I take a low-light 
picture on the fly, I prefer it to be sharp and correctly exposed. But I 
have also seen plenty of boring technically perfect pics and plenty of 
interesting ones with imperfections.

Cheers,
Nathan

Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
http://www.nathanfoto.com

Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog






On Mar 5, 2010, at 9:24 PM, George Lottermoser wrote:

> I quite agree with you, in theory, Nathan.
> Most certainly as it relates to your own photographic methods and desired 
> results
> (or Lluis' or anyone else's).
> 
> Yet, when one truly wishes to achieve something photographically,
> say sharpness of the subject in difficult, low light situations,
> then strives to accomplish that personal goal,
> by choosing the correct tools, and developing techniques to achieve the 
> goal,
> that's when the extraordinary unique statements occur.
> 
> Doug H seems a perfect example
> of one who listens attentively to his own yearning for a specific result
> and works constantly at figuring out how to achieve it,
> via specific tool choices and techniques.
> 
> So for some sharpness and detail qualifies as a major element of success.
> For others the tonality,
> or the composition,
> or the veracity of the document
> or the emotional impact
> or the avant-garde nature of the image
> all to varying degrees
> as fitting the individual photographer's intention.
> 
> So - Geoff, take that M9 into the dark
> and show us some tack sharp, emotionally charged photographs
> if that's what your muse demands.
> 
> ;~)
> 
> Regards,
> George Lottermoser
> george at imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com/blog
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
> 
> On Mar 5, 2010, at 1:50 PM, Nathan Wajsman wrote:
> 
>> I think you have plenty of skill, Geoff. I think it is more a question of 
>> realizing that sharpness is not everything. I have become much more 
>> accepting lately of camera shake if the content is interesting.
>> 
>> I am not implying Lluis's pictures were unsharp, just a general comment 
>> about low-light shooting.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 



Replies: Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Some from a party)
In reply to: Message from lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll Querol) ([Leica] Some from a party)
Message from jsmith342 at gmail.com (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] Some from a party)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Some from a party)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Some from a party)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Some from a party)