Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/02/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Zeiss Wide Angle 35mm f/2 Biogon T* ZM
From: tgray at 125px.com (Tim Gray)
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 17:38:58 -0500
References: <f681deda1002262059p49eb4aaga0091f77e3b54a5@mail.gmail.com>

On Feb 27, 2010 at 09:29 AM +0430, Wendy Thurman wrote:
> While of course a Leica 35 cron is, well, a Leica, I would appreciate
> opinions or experiences any of you may have with this lens.  It's
> affordably priced and appears to be generally well-regarded.

I had this lens for about a year and a half and really didn't use any other 
lenses during that period.  It's a fantastic lens.  Very dependable.  There 
might be other lenses out there that are sharper in the center, but the ZM 
is very even across the frame, very flare resistant, and shows almost zero 
distortion.  The only complaints one could have of it are it's size and 
ergonomics.  I didn't mind the size (still smaller than the 50 Summicron I 
had at the time), though I did find the 1/3 aperture stops a little funny.

I have read of ZM lenses developing wobble or something like it, but in all 
the lenses I've ever had, the only two that have had problems were a Leica 
lens and a Canon EF 50/1.4 - broken focus, which is a common problem with 
that lens.

The only reason I sold the ZM was I decided that 35mm wasn't for me.  I 
ended up with a 28mm that I like a lot more.


In reply to: Message from thurmanphoto at gmail.com (Wendy Thurman) ([Leica] Zeiss Wide Angle 35mm f/2 Biogon T* ZM)