Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/02/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Feb 27, 2010 at 09:29 AM +0430, Wendy Thurman wrote: > While of course a Leica 35 cron is, well, a Leica, I would appreciate > opinions or experiences any of you may have with this lens. It's > affordably priced and appears to be generally well-regarded. I had this lens for about a year and a half and really didn't use any other lenses during that period. It's a fantastic lens. Very dependable. There might be other lenses out there that are sharper in the center, but the ZM is very even across the frame, very flare resistant, and shows almost zero distortion. The only complaints one could have of it are it's size and ergonomics. I didn't mind the size (still smaller than the 50 Summicron I had at the time), though I did find the 1/3 aperture stops a little funny. I have read of ZM lenses developing wobble or something like it, but in all the lenses I've ever had, the only two that have had problems were a Leica lens and a Canon EF 50/1.4 - broken focus, which is a common problem with that lens. The only reason I sold the ZM was I decided that 35mm wasn't for me. I ended up with a 28mm that I like a lot more.