Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/02/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] The M5
From: len-001 at verizon.net (Leonard Taupier)
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 10:46:14 -0500
References: <be0ea0261002251757j9fcd279u29d1c13ea1e51ab8@mail.gmail.com> <19b6d42d1002252203oe2bc830i658fe3eb08332b29@mail.gmail.com> <9BA57A47-ED4B-4E57-BAC1-03771080B7FF@verizon.net> <a3f189161002260715o1349a227jf25a17c07c20a866@mail.gmail.com>

Thanks, Sonny. That's a good article.

Len


On Feb 26, 2010, at 10:15 AM, Sonny Carter wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 8:52 AM, Leonard Taupier  
> <len-001 at verizon.net>wrote:
>
>> Hello Vince,
>>
>> I have a M5 and love the camera. It has been recalibrated to use  
>> modern
>> batteries and works perfectly. It's a little heavier then the  
>> other M bodies
>> and a couple lenses can't be used because of interference with the  
>> swing up
>> meter. But it handles very nicely and is one of my favorites. If  
>> my memory
>> serves me right I think Richard Man had one as well.  I'm also  
>> sure some of
>> the collector's in the group have one. I have never heard it  
>> described as
>> much deplored even though it was not popular when first released.
>>
>> Len
>>
>
> I've never heard it called deplored.  It was never popular, partly  
> because
> it came out about the same time as the much cheaper CL, but  It is  
> a fine
> camera.  I've owned two of them, and both I think are still in the  
> hands of
> LUG members since I am now largely digital.
>
>  Cameraquest has a nice article on the camera here:
>
> http://www.cameraquest.com/m5.htm
>
>
> -- 
> Regards,
>
> Sonny
> http://www.sonc.com
> http://sonc.stumbleupon.com/
> Natchitoches, Louisiana
> (+31.754164,-093.099080)
>
> USA
>
>
>
>>
>>
>> On Feb 26, 2010, at 1:03 AM, Vince Passaro wrote:
>>
>>  I read on flickr of the jet blue adventure but i'm not clear on  
>> why this
>>> leads to your not keeping batteries in the camera? The M6 has  
>>> Leica's
>>> first
>>> TTL meter, is that right? Was it or the M5 (not counting the  
>>> lovely CL of
>>> course) the first M series with a meter?
>>>
>>> [ Totally off the point, I have yet to see anyone on the LUG cop  
>>> to owning
>>> the much deplored M5. How bad can they be? When you find them,  
>>> they ain't
>>> cheap; but nobody seems to own one either. ]
>>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from vick.ko at sympatico.ca (vick.ko at sympatico.ca) ([Leica] The M5)
In reply to: Message from scleroplex at gmail.com (scleroplex) ([Leica] greetings)
Message from passaro.vince at gmail.com (Vince Passaro) ([Leica] greetings)
Message from len-001 at verizon.net (Leonard Taupier) ([Leica] The M5)
Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] The M5)