Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/02/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I can't fault that logic at all :-) One thing I don't understand is why in our local branch of Boots the Chemist, pregnancy test kits are right next to the condoms. Doesn't inspire much confidence...:-) Cheers Mark Mark Pope, Swindon, Wilts UK Homepage http://www.monomagic.co.uk Blog http://www.monomagic.co.uk/blog Picture a week (2010) http://www.monomagic.co.uk/index.php?gallery=paw/2010 Picture a week (2009) http://www.monomagic.co.uk/index.php?gallery=paw/2009 (2008) http://www.monomagic.co.uk/index.php?gallery=paw/2008 Nathan Wajsman wrote: > Well no, it makes perfect sense: if you use the first two products > diligently, you will have an attractive smile and thus be more likely to > score, in which case you will need the third group of products. > > Cheers, > Nathan > > Nathan Wajsman > Alicante, Spain > http://www.frozenlight.eu > http://www.greatpix.eu > http://www.nathanfoto.com > > Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0 > PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws > Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog > > > > > > > On Feb 6, 2010, at 4:20 PM, Roger Rubin wrote: > >> Hi All: >> Product placement- local drug store...what were they thinking? Or what was >> I thinking? >> >> http://v-images.smugmug.com/Other/LEICAMIX/11158095_n4hK2#782092168_n2W4W-L-LB >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information