Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2010/02/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] from last summer
From: lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll Querol)
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 00:37:57 +0100
References: <08F5A26C-6812-4CF7-A6CF-B5C75C82E786@gmail.com> <4B685DD9.9050907@whitedogs.co.uk> <9FB60F09-60CF-4782-A595-3EAAF5F1EA41@gmail.com> <36172e5a1002021506x43f5c283i10f597b2c64f450a@mail.gmail.com> <949C657C-18BB-448C-A376-2296B73FECB3@embarqmail.com>
Hi Ric,
I have not a deep knowledge of all these things, I've calibrated it at
2.1 and I think is correct, IMO at 2.2 was too contrasted.
You are right the default gamma was 1.8
Thank you,
Lluis
El 03/02/2010, a las 0:15, Ric Carter escribi?:
> for years mac used a default gamma of 1.8, pc used 2.1
>
> with OSX 10.6 mac moves to 2.2 as well
>
> ric
>
> On Feb 2, 2010, at 6:06 PM, Geoff Hopkinson wrote:
>
>> Lluis that is a really good idea. All of the Photoshop experts that
>> I read
>> say that even Macs should use that white point.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
Replies:
Reply from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] from last summer)
In reply to:
Message from lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll Querol) ([Leica] from last summer)
Message from mark at whitedogs.co.uk (Mark Pope) ([Leica] from last summer)
Message from lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll Querol) ([Leica] from last summer)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] from last summer)
Message from ricc at embarqmail.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] from last summer)