Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/02/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] EYE BLINK TIME?
From: steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour)
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 09:02:59 -0800
References: <23502690.1264904017335.JavaMail.root@wamui-junio.atl.sa.earthlink.net> <B3109AE1-1427-422F-A6D4-D1A56438DE74@gmail.com> <20100201142217.GB30022@ssx-book.125px.com> <DAF6F897-735D-4101-873E-40949532832E@gmail.com> <69471C671C6F4ECCA2923747BC96480C@syneticfeba505>

On Feb 1, 2010, at 8:58 AM, <tedgrant at shaw.ca> wrote:

> OK Gentlemen here is the official international ruling which generally 
> applies to the super high end events. Read on:
> 
>>> In track and field sprints, the sport's governing body, the IAAF, has a 
>>> rule that if the athlete moves within 0.10 seconds after the gun has 
>>> fired the athlete has false started. [2] This figure is based on tests 
>>> that show the human brain cannot hear and process the information from 
>>> the start sound in under 0.10 seconds.[3] This rule is only applied at 
>>> high-level meets where fully automated motion sensor devices are built 
>>> into the starting blocks that are tied via computer with the starter's 
>>> gun. In the vast majority of lower-level meets, false starts are 
>>> determined visually by the officials.<<<<<<<<<
> 
> And like I said, " I've never seen nor heard of this before."  But her you 
> have it!

so they are really trying to prevent anticipation, but what if a super high 
end athlete (by definition an outlier) can react faster?

soon they will punish high end photographers who anticipate,

Steve
> 
> ted
> ===========================================
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Barbour" <steve.barbour at 
> gmail.com>
> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
> Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 7:46 AM
> Subject: Re: [Leica] EYE BLINK TIME?
> 
> 
>> 
>> On Feb 1, 2010, at 6:22 AM, Tim Gray wrote:
>> 
>>> On Sat 30, Jan'10 at  6:19 PM -0800, Steve Barbour wrote:
>>>>> IIRC a Canadian sprinter was DQ'd for repeatedly reacting more quickly 
>>>>> that was considered possible.
>>>> 
>>>> Whatever happened to the runner's "anticipation of the gun"  ?
>>> 
>>> It's ok as long as you don't anticipate it too perfect.  :D
>> 
>> 
>> hmmm...
>> 
>> 
>> they can call a false start even if the runner starts after the gun  ??
>> 
>> 
>> Steve
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 8.5.432 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2660 - Release Date: 01/31/10 
> 19:35:00
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie) ([Leica] EYE BLINK TIME?)
In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (Doug Herr) ([Leica] EYE BLINK TIME?)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] EYE BLINK TIME?)
Message from tgray at 125px.com (Tim Gray) ([Leica] EYE BLINK TIME?)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] EYE BLINK TIME?)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (tedgrant at shaw.ca) ([Leica] EYE BLINK TIME?)