Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/01/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Jan 29, 2010, at 10:06 PM, Nathan Wajsman wrote: > Steve, the Ricoh has the usual tiny sensor found in compacts; and in > addition, the lens is non-interchangeable. So I am not sure how relevant > such a comparison would be. I guess that with the lenses I mentionned the image quality of the GF1 is much better, that's what I am after.... I saw the Ricoh the other day for the first time, tiny , attractive, and the images were excellent, (a friend had one) I am curious about how these attractive small cameras compare... many thanks, Steve > > Cheers, > Nathan > > Nathan Wajsman > Alicante, Spain > http://www.frozenlight.eu > http://www.greatpix.eu > http://www.nathanfoto.com > > Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0 > PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws > Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog > > > > On Jan 30, 2010, at 6:50 AM, Steve Barbour wrote: > >> I'm wondering with the recent interest in the Panasonic GF1 with the 20mm >> pancake lens and an external optical VF, has any used/compared this to >> the Ricoh GRD-III with its 28mm lens and the optional external >> viewfinder... >> >> I 'd be very interested to hear your thoughts, reactions, comparisons, >> >> appreciated, >> >> >> Steve >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information