Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/01/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] A non-scientific comparison of the E3 and M8u
From: photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman)
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 05:45:13 +0100
References: <10363428.1264214153729.JavaMail.root@wamui-june.atl.sa.earthlink.net>

My guesses were 100% correct, and it was not even based on picture 
quality...it was obvious from the aspect ratio in most cases. If you really 
want to make a blind test, you must crop all the images square. Otherwise, 
one can immediately see the 3:2 vs. 4:3 format from the respective cameras.

Cheers,
Nathan

Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
http://www.nathanfoto.com

Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog



On Jan 23, 2010, at 3:35 AM, Doug Herr wrote:

> Richard Man wrote:
> 
>> Do not peek at the EXIF, see if you can see which ones are which, or
>> which ones you like better.
>> 
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/richardman/E3M8BakeOff/
> 
> I peeked after guessing and ~75% of my guesses were correct.  The clues I 
> used were color quality, bokeh or a combination of the two.
> 
> Doug Herr
> Birdman of Sacramento
> http://www.wildlightphoto.com
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 



Replies: Reply from richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] A non-scientific comparison of the E3 and M8u)
In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (Doug Herr) ([Leica] A non-scientific comparison of the E3 and M8u)