Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/01/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Michael is an excellent photographer and a clear writer who articulates his thoughts very well. I do disagree with him on this, however, which points to one major issue which is probably the hardest thing for Leica to manage - if they stay the same they are likely to go broke because of their obsolescence; if they change they can't keep everyone happy. Personally I'd prefer a camera with an optical viewfinder with projected electronic framelines that were corrected for parallax and distance and electronic focus confirmation. But I also acknowledge that a lot of people would hate that. Maybe the S2 will be the answer? At least it's real. Marty On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 6:56 AM, philippe.amard <philippe.amard at sfr.fr> wrote: > Any former R user would buy an M with a real VF > > Mark, over to you :-) > > Philippe > > Le 21 janv. 10 ? 21:08, Steve Barbour a ?crit : > >> >> >> http://www.luminous-landscape.com/essays/leica-open-letter.shtml >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > > NO ARCHIVE > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >