Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/01/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] GF-1 getting trashed on Wired.com
From: hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson)
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 08:10:26 +1000
References: <9F07836ED74F1C42AA69DFBAF8A1E2F13785087807@MBX1.asc.local>

My favourite posted comment:
 "Because the registration distance for u43 is so small, the lens adapters
don?t need glass elements to refocus, and thus no light is lost."


Cheers
Geoff
http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman


2010/1/20 Kyle Cassidy <kcassidy at asc.upenn.edu>

> For your cringing pleasure -- Wired magazine has, what I think is a pretty
> accurate review of the GF-1 up:
>
>
> http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2010/01/five-reasons-you-should-ditch-your-dslr/
>
> currently it's being pummeled in two pages of some of the most vituperative
> and angry comments I've ever seen in an equipment review. Yikes.
>
> Fwiw, I still like mine.
>
> http://www.kylecassidy.com/lj/2010/iron-witch-1.jpg
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


Replies: Reply from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] GF-1 getting trashed on Wired.com)
In reply to: Message from kcassidy at asc.upenn.edu (Kyle Cassidy) ([Leica] GF-1 getting trashed on Wired.com)