Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/01/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I have tried to love the wide angles. But I don't use my 15 any more. 28 is plenty wide for me. Occasionally a 21 when there really is no space. But the strange faces on the side make me try to avoid it. cheers, Michiel Fokkema ------------------------- Fokkema Fotografie www.michielfokkema.com michiel.fokkema at gmail.com +31(0)615569576 Lawrence Zeitlin wrote: > Mark writes: > > "Things get wider and wider every year. > > The whole mindset of the photographing world. > > The Leica 18 is the new 21. > > And you could be shooting with a 15 or a 12. And plenty do all the time. > > Lots of them are the top people." > > > - - - - - > > > > Why are ultra wide angle lenses becoming so popular? > > > In 1966, Edward Hall wrote, in "The Hidden Dimension," that people space > themselves at a distance that is appropriate to the degree of relationship > to the "other." People interact at a greater distance from strangers than > with friends and at a greater distance from friends than with lovers. There > are very specific visual cues for each distance. With strangers, the > distance, usually about two arm's length, does not emphasize small aspects > of appearance and there is little perspective distortion. Sort of like > using > the often recommended 90 mm lens on a 35 mm camera to shoot portraits. At > the closer friendship distance, say about one arm's length, there is a > moderate visual distortion. The nose of a person looking toward you appears > slightly magnified compared to the ears. Perhaps equivalent to the 50 mm > lens perspective on your film Leica when shooting portraits. At the > intimate > distance, less than 18 inches, there is considerable visual distortion. The > nose appears much larger than the ears and the face fills most of the > visual > field. We grow accustomed to these visual effects and often use them to > gauge the degree of relationship between people from photos. > > > A few years ago there was a spate of TV commercials shot at ultra close > distances for hawking personal use products. I guess the producers read > Hall's book and concluded that you would believe an intimate friend rather > than a make believe doctor in a white coat filmed at the formal distance. > > > There is a reciprocal aspect to this relationship, often triggered by the > visual cues. If we are forced into anintimate distance by seating > accommodations or by crowding, such as close seating in an airplane or at a > bar, we soon act as if the relationship was appropriate to the distance. > Thus we may hear or tell of personal life stories to seat mates or bar > buddies that would never come up in casual conversation between strangers. > The tortured mental logic is as follows: > > 1. The visual cues tell me that I am within the intimate distance from this > stranger. > > 2. I would never get this close to a casual acquaintance therefore he is my > friend. > > 3. Since we are on intimate terms, I can confide my personal secrets. > > Needless to say, this bond is broken when the plane lands and the distance > increases. > > > In photographic terms ultra wide angle lenses, especially in close ups, > create the same form of visual distortion as personal spacing at the > intimate distance. Pictures taken with these lenses have the same sort of > psychological relevance as sitting close to a stranger.They are attention > grabbing because of the pseudo intimacy. But ultimately these pictures are > disturbing because we realize that we are being fooled. Our attention has > been hijacked, not by the pictorial content, but by the illusion of > personal > relevance. As we become accustomed to the visual trickery the effect > lessens. That's why the TV commercials lost favor. > > > Ultra wide angle lenses depict a travesty of life. Ultimately we will all > return to sanity and use normal lenses. Even the top people. > > > Larry Z > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information