Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/12/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Dec 22, 2009, at 2:47 PM, George Lottermoser wrote: > Maybe one has to have read all the M8, M8.2, and M9 whining > to fully appreciate the thread. > > The humor, for me, comes from how the same points are being made > on the 5th, 6th, and 7th generation digital M's. > Only the absurd ISO and Megapixel specs have changed. > > My eyes are still watering. hopefully your M8 is in a baggie somewhere else, :-) Steve > > Regards, > George Lottermoser > george at imagist.com > http://www.imagist.com > http://www.imagist.com/blog > http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist > > On Dec 22, 2009, at 4:18 PM, Mark Rabiner wrote: > >> If the M9 was just around the pike followed by the M10 with a the M12 >> just a >> few years later it would be a lot funnier. >> As the greatest humor comes from things the closest to the truth. >> >> As this is Leica even digital Leica I don't think we're going to see a >> string of consecutive M's to try to keep up with. >> I think they will remain just about as conservative as ever. >> >> The M9 will be followed in three years by the M11. >> Four years later we'll see the M10. >> 5 years after than we'll se the M13B. >> They M12 mysteriously skipped. > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information