Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/12/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] A tad noncommittal X1 review
From: photo.forrest at earthlink.net (Philip Forrest)
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 00:46:59 -0500
References: <49DDC39C-D23B-4B4D-8AFE-5BD29E1778BD@frozenlight.eu> <C754759C.5AB8F%mark@rabinergroup.com>

Is that compression lossy?


On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 00:45:16 -0500
Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> wrote:

> > But it will not be used to take pictures unless the issues
> > identified in the review are addressed...slow AF couple with
> > impossible MF--would you put up with it just because there is a red
> > dot? I would not, certainly not at the price being asked.
> > 
> > Nathan
> 
> 
> 
> Yes like the irreconcilable buffer problems with the M9 we read about
> two weeks ago.
> Read the last review on that from from two days ago.
> Just set it at compressed and it works perfectly not with the added
> jpeg.
> 
> Leica is not going to come out with a camera which doesn't work.
> They've not gotten all of a sudden real stupid.
> 
> 
> 
> Mark William Rabiner
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] A tad noncommittal X1 review)
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] A tad noncommittal X1 review)
In reply to: Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] A tad noncommittal X1 review)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] A tad noncommittal X1 review)