Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/12/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Dec 11, 2009, at 4:19 PM, Lluis Ripoll Querol wrote: > Hi Richard, > > The M3 is more confortable on my eyes than the M8, I think that this is > the reason why the focus is more accurate, even if the lens is very old, > it is from ca. 1949... What I see is the contrast and tonal differences, > the film gives IMO more rich tones and contrast in B&W than digital..., > maybe also I don't have enough skills on Capure One or Photoshop. > > Thank you for looking, and your comments > > Cheers > Lluis > > > El 12/12/2009, a las 1:07, Richard Man escribi?: > >> Clearly, use photoshop to copy the woman from the second picture to >> the first picture. A masterpiece :-) >> >> Certainly, besides the DoF difference, very little discernible >> differences? I like the more subtle tone of Illford, but that's >> probably just my brain telling me what I want to hear. >> >> >> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Lluis Ripoll Querol >> <lluisripollquerol at gmail.com> wrote: >>> From last Summer, same situation, 2 cameras, 2 different lenses, film and >>> pixels... >>> >>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Sitges/L1008100BW.jpg.html >>> M8, probably with Tri Elmar >>> >>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Sitges/2009060230.jpg.html >>> M3, Zeiss Sonnar Opton, Ilford 50 ISO >>> >>> What do you think?.... >>> >>> Thanks... >> >> -- >> // richard m: richard @imagecraft.com >> // w: http://www.imagecraft.com/pub/Portfolio09/ blog: >> http://rfman.wordpress.com >> // book: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/detail/745963 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information