[Leica] Epson 4880

[abridge at gmail.com (Adam Bridge)]

I'm not sure that's so, Howard. There's a substantial difference in
form factor between these two printers.

Adam

On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 5:31 PM, Howard Ritter <hlritter at bex.net> wrote:
> So this would mean no 4900 either, I guess.
>
> ?howard
>
>
> On Nov 30, 2009, at 8:03 PM, Ken Carney wrote:
>
>> Howard,
>>
>> There is an interesting article on the Luminous Landscape site comparing 
>> (I
>> think) the 7880 and the 7900. ?The difference in gamut was pretty
>> interesting. ?I have been lusting after a 3880 (not available right now) 
>> and
>> evidently there will not be a 3900 because of the size of the heads being
>> incompatible with a 17" printer.
>>
>> Ken
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: lug-bounces+kcarney1=cox.net at leica-users.org [mailto:lug-
>>> bounces+kcarney1=cox.net at leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Howard Ritter
>>> Sent: Monday, November 30, 2009 5:53 PM
>>> To: Leica Users Group; MUGers at yahoogroups.com
>>> Subject: [Leica] Epson 4880
>>>
>>> B&H's website is indicating that each form of the Epson 4880 is "out of
>>> stock" or "temporarily unavailable", and the Epson website is offering a
>>> $500 rebate on 4880s.
>>>
>>> Is this very recent? If so, isn't it the sort of premonitory tremor that
>>> typically precedes the seismic shift of introducing a new model that
>>> supersedes the old? Is the 4900 just around the corner? Shall I make what
>>> was to have been a Christmas present my birthday present in May instead?
>>>
>>> -howard
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>