Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/11/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Unless you're trying to show people in their environment, which is something I've been trying to do in my own photography. I think uncropped the picture is overall a more interesting photo and, besides, as I've said before, every shot doesn't have to sock you in the jaw. Regards, Dick On Nov 18, 2009, at 7:03 PM, Lawrence Zeitlin wrote: > There seems to be a lot of difference of opinion on PAW 46. I prefer > the > cropped shot. To my mind it is a photo of people, not the environment. > Simplify, simplify. > > Larry Z > - - - - - > > Thanks Dick > > > much appreciated comment here > > > Bien cordialement de Metz > > Philippe > > > > Richard Taylor wrote: > > > Uncropped. It provides more context and adds interest in the form of > > another intensely listening face. The waiters arm, which might > > otherwise be disturbing, only emphasizes the that this is a picture > > of an interesting conversation going on over dinner in a really nice > > restaurant. > > > Regards, > > > Dick > > > > > On Nov 18, 2009, at 1:50 PM, Philippe Amard wrote: > > > PAW 46 is up, but I'm still wondering if the crop > > > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/PAW-2009/2009-PAW-46-Triangulation-1140498.jpg.html > > > > > is any better than the original shot. > > > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/PAW-2009/2009-PAW-46-Triangulation-1140498-2.jpg.html > > > > > Thanks in anticipation for on or off-list input or feedback > > > Best from Metz > > Phx > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information