Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2009/11/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] M9 reviewers drawn from the "unwashed masses"
From: red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone)
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 21:38:47 -0800
References: <C71D1BB1.58386%mark@rabinergroup.com> <83E05ADF-731E-4801-88EF-4E2764C50532@ameritech.net> <006701ca61b7$ff8f20c0$fead6240$@net> <902D2214-55B2-4BB9-B5D0-C417A9E11E2A@btinternet.com>
I think we have a basic, and deeply different, point of view.
I believe there is a big ( in Leica terms) market for a Digi-R. Do they
have to develop it themselves? No. The camera must accept R mount lenses,
and be digital capture.
Get someone else to do the R+D on one of their own Digi-bodies, private
brand the thing "Leica", and adapt the mount to the R lenses.
No AF
This is not that hard......and it does not have to be priced at $25,000.
And now you have a new market for the world's best SLR lenses......put them
back into production......
It costs a lot less to keep your current customers then it does to get new
customers......
Frank Filippone
red735i at earthlink.net
But we -know- the R market is tiny compared even to the M market. The
R8 almost bankrupted the company.
Replies:
Reply from Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie) ([Leica] M9 reviewers drawn from the "unwashed masses")
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] M9 reviewers drawn from the "unwashed masses")
In reply to:
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] m9 review)
Message from dstella1 at ameritech.net (Dante Stella) ([Leica] M9 reviewers drawn from the "unwashed masses")
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] M9 reviewers drawn from the "unwashed masses")
Message from Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie) ([Leica] M9 reviewers drawn from the "unwashed masses")