Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/11/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Why the mad rush / toxicity
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:23:43 -0500

> Tina - I admire your determination.  Those processors were hard to
> maintain.  Mark - I agree that for working photographers concentrating
> on photos is the way to go.  I still like B&W darkroom work, but I
> mostly only need to please myself.  Having said that, my last paying
> jobs were all done all on film and was requested to do so by the
> clients, who had seen some of my stuff from before digital was really
> available.  I wouldn't, however, like to rely on that as a source of
> income.
> 
> M


Keeping your book current is a thing a fine art photographer is always doing
as well as a commercial photographer as well as a promotional photographer
as well as a wedding photographer.
They don't look like paper sample books They are all done on the same paper.
Playing around with papers is not photography.
Picking one and sticking with it is.


Mark William Rabiner





In reply to: Message from benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney) ([Leica] Why the mad rush / toxicity)