Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2009/11/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Why the mad rush / toxicity / DARKROOMS & CHEMICALS.
From: images at comporium.net (Tina Manley)
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 16:45:30 -0500
References: <C71819F8.57F60%mark@rabinergroup.com> <A3306028-C1B0-4FD4-BF37-5901D1A320CF@gmail.com> <F7A89B679AEC4D529BE53CE61E4AFF96@jimnichols> <4E3764774E0740E2BDAA37ED4411C3CF@syneticfeba505> <200911052110.BZV56030@rg4.comporium.net> <7ac27f4f0911051325q6dd7bce0nb6e4b4ad52e15b4f@mail.gmail.com>
At 04:25 PM 11/5/2009, you wrote:
>I do know that I have seen some of the Ansel Adam's silver print up
>close and the depth is stunning. The shadow just floats out of the
>print. Strictly speaking of B&W (wetprint colors lost the war many
>years ago), I have seen many good inkjet print too, but silver is
>different from floating dots.
I have one of his prints in my darkroom and used it for a benchmark
for what I might someday achive. I guess we'll have to agree to disagree.
Tina
Tina Manley
www.tinamanley.com
In reply to:
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Why the mad rush to use Canon or Nikon bodies?)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Why the mad rush / toxicity)
Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] Why the mad rush / toxicity)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (tedgrant at shaw.ca) ([Leica] Why the mad rush / toxicity / DARKROOMS & CHEMICALS.)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Why the mad rush / toxicity / DARKROOMS & CHEMICALS.)
Message from richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Why the mad rush / toxicity / DARKROOMS & CHEMICALS.)