Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2009/11/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Why the mad rush / toxic chemicals
From: steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour)
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 23:31:58 -0800
References: <1221585813.4002271257361118500.JavaMail.root@mail02.pantherlink.uwm.edu> <A3B14B9F-9012-4709-9501-D9DEE30E24D7@mac.com> <200911041931.CAD90281@rg5.comporium.net> <7ac27f4f0911041733t27a1cea3la16dac3b0152bece@mail.gmail.com> <AE6636DA-2C51-4D91-80AD-1D9540729AA6@embarqmail.com> <a3f189160911041817p11e62aefw1f1ffef9a3a1c902@mail.gmail.com> <7ac27f4f0911041822g27c3235eu4c16d41dfa47805a@mail.gmail.com> <8F7E6DDD-1F73-4B28-9658-67B6E17D7330@embarqmail.com> <7ac27f4f0911041856n426c13a5v578624256ce2189d@mail.gmail.com> <41698E4A-041D-46C4-9E19-18840E46EAA1@embarqmail.com> <7ac27f4f0911042134u3f337fd0kd31cfa3efafaeb08@mail.gmail.com>
On Nov 4, 2009, at 9:34 PM, Richard Man wrote:
> Wow, I didn't mean to insult anyone but obviously touched a nerve.
> Sorry about that.
> My throw-away remark about carpel tunnel is simply that moving from
> wet darkroom to dry lightroom does not automatically mean it is much
> safer. There are risks to everything. Here's one example that may not
> be obvious - in the darkroom, most people stand. In front of the
> computer, most people sit, and more likely with improper postures, and
> so it goes.
I have been reading about toxic chemicals in the darkroom...
many are volatile, and many are liver and neuro toxins,
and are very soluble in fat which is a big part of cell membranes as
well as the insulation of neurons....
it's really pretty scary...
your remarks related to posture show extreme naivete...
here is a url of a note contributed to the LUG, on this subject, from
Jim Brick....
http://leica-users.org/v04/msg00434.html
Steve
Replies:
Reply from richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Why the mad rush / toxic chemicals)
In reply to:
Message from amr3 at uwm.edu (Alan Magayne-Roshak) ([Leica] Why the mad rush to use Canon or Nikon bodies?)
Message from rclompus at mac.com (Richard Clompus) ([Leica] Why the mad rush to use Canon or Nikon bodies?)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Why the mad rush to use Canon or Nikon bodies?)
Message from richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Why the mad rush to use Canon or Nikon bodies?)
Message from ricc at embarqmail.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] Why the mad rush to use Canon or Nikon bodies?)
Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] Why the mad rush to use Canon or Nikon bodies?)
Message from richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Why the mad rush to use Canon or Nikon bodies?)
Message from ricc at embarqmail.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] Why the mad rush to use Canon or Nikon bodies?)
Message from richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Why the mad rush to use Canon or Nikon bodies?)
Message from ricc at embarqmail.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] Why the mad rush to use Canon or Nikon bodies?)
Message from richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Why the mad rush to use Canon or Nikon bodies?)