Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/10/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]If the reports of M9 production at full capacity are true it would seem that non of these changes are urgently needed. Doug Herr Birdman of Sacramento http://www.wildlightphoto.com -----Original Message----- >From: Richard Man <richard.lists at gmail.com> >Sent: Oct 26, 2009 8:53 PM >To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> >Subject: Re: [Leica] M9 improvements > >There is ONLY one thing that M10 needs to do, and it will double the sales. > >Change the price to $5000 :-) > >On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Nathan Wajsman <photo at frozenlight.eu> >wrote: >> I can think of at least the following that would be included in a future >> M10: >> >> - better high ISO performance (whether or not at the cost of reducing >> pixel >> count must depend on the state of sensor technology in a couple of years) >> - a flip-out LCD with Live View >> - video capability >> - geo tagging and other snazzy features found on modern cameras >> - wifi or bluetooth or 3G/4G capability >> >> Not all of these are important to me personally (the first two are), but I >> can imagine that they are for the market. > > > > >-- >// richard m: richard @imagecraft.com >// w: http://www.imagecraft.com/pub/Portfolio09/ blog: >http://rfman.wordpress.com >// book: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/detail/745963 > >_______________________________________________ >Leica Users Group. >See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information