Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/10/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Mark, I'm lucky enough right now to have both, and I'll keep both. I got both for a fair bit less than the 75/2 costs new. They are different enough and have enough different strengths that it makes it worthwhile to keep both. The Summilux design may be older and heavier but all I can suggest is that you compare them yourself instead of making such comparisons off the cuff. It's like saying the 100/3.5 Zeiss for Hasselblad is so much better than the 150/4 that you might as well throw the 150 away. :-) In my experience the two 75's are closer in performance than the 100 and 150 Zeiss lenses. >Never in a million years would I want the 1.4 over the Leica Telephoto 75mm >f/2.0 APO Summicron M Aspherical Manual Focus Lens (6-Bit, Updated for >Digital) and get cutting edge compact modern Leica performance to knock out >Canon and Nikon results. >Sorry to rub owners of the Summilux the wrong way but it seems to me >quaint, dated and overblown, front heavy and bloated, too heavy, old. >A result of the speed wars of the 60's and 70's see Erwin's thing on the >75mm focal lengh: >http://www.imx.nl/photo/leica/lenses/lenses/page82.html > > >Mark William Rabiner > > > > >_______________________________________________ >Leica Users Group. >See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information -- * Henning J. Wulff /|\ Wulff Photography & Design /###\ mailto:henningw at archiphoto.com |[ ]| http://www.archiphoto.com