Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/10/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] LUG M9 owners ( was [Fwd: Leica Newsletter --05 October2009])
From: photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman)
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 20:26:30 +0200
References: <F5566D96619A444680CBD039D3C93F97@pc17mujllksjjc> <100620091704.26706.4ACB788A000916C900006852223245003003010CD2079C080C03BF970A9D9F9A0B9D09@mchsi.com> <20091006172221.GY4046@jbm.org>

My feelings exactly, after taking 8000 pictures with my M8--I look at  
the framelines, if they are not wide enough, I put a wider lens on. I  
think being hung up on a size defined by a historical accident is silly.

I did enjoy fondling Neil's M9, but I must also say that I was  
slightly disappointed that Leica crowded 18 megapixels onto the  
sensor, effectively making it the same pixel density as the M8. A more  
moderate 14 megapixels would have been much better IMO from the point  
of view of low-light performance.

Nathan

Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
http://www.nathanfoto.com

Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog



On Oct 6, 2009, at 7:22 PM, Jeff Moore wrote:

> 2009-10-06-13:04:10 grduprey at mchsi.com:
>> I never thought twice about the crop factor, I shot what I saw in the
>> viewfinder.
>
> Yeah, that's always been my experience with the M8.  You make sure the
> picture you want is inside the framelines, and push the button.  It
> continues to be the best camera (for me) that I've ever used, and I've
> never understood the obsession with a digital camera's sensor having  
> to
> be exactly the same size as a hunk of 35mm film used to be.
>
> Having said that, it sounds as if the M9 is an even better M8, and I'd
> love to have one;  hope to, eventually.  But not because of some  
> special
> magic about the particular format 35mm still film used to have.
>
>> the M8 works just fine for me... That and the DMR.
>
> What he said.
>
> The DMR is a particularly special case -- bulky, slow in a few ways,
> not so great in the dim -- but (in addition to the great image quality
> under the right conditions) it has one fantastic feature which I (as
> an unrepentant rangefinder guy) absolutely LOVE, and despair of ever
> seeing in another SLR: a frameline!  I really really like being able  
> to
> see some context around what will actually be in the picture.  As in a
> rangefinder, it helps me do the visual edit to choose the picture.  I
> know it's just an artifact of the way the DMR is a retrofit, and it
> makes me sad that I'll never see it in a future SLR.
>
> -Jeff M
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] LUG M9 owners ( was [Fwd: Leica Newsletter --05 October2009]))
In reply to: Message from eric.calderwood at btinternet.com (EricC) ([Leica] LUG M9 owners ( was [Fwd: Leica Newsletter --05 October 2009]))
Message from grduprey at mchsi.com (grduprey at mchsi.com) ([Leica] LUG M9 owners ( was [Fwd: Leica Newsletter --05 October2009]))
Message from jbm at jbm.org (Jeff Moore) ([Leica] LUG M9 owners ( was [Fwd: Leica Newsletter --05 October2009]))