Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/09/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] LFI
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 05:14:44 -0400
 
> Without having seen this particular issue of LFI, let us not forget
> that the magazine is allegedly independent of Leica and makes its own
> editorial choices. I subscribed to it for a couple of years in the
> late 1990s but found that the photography was generally of poor
> quality and a bad showcase for Leica, and the articles were poorly
> written as well. I don't know if the quality of the magazine has
> improved since, but it doesn't sound like it.
> 
> Nathan


It doest FEEL independent of Leica.
I've never read it say anything really bad about any Leica product.
Its a cheering section in slick print.


Mark William Rabiner
Replies: Reply from john.o.newell at comcast.net (J. Newell) ([Leica] LFI)
Reply from Neil.Beddoe at raidllp.com (Neil Beddoe) ([Leica] LFI)
 In reply to: Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] LFI)