Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2009/09/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] X1 might be ok
From: richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man)
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 02:00:41 -0700
References: <440b792d0909082124o52a31b6p45706fbac43662b8@mail.gmail.com> <7ac27f4f0909082151h6e77f0b1wf0202ba128d0ce36@mail.gmail.com> <3A125937-39C6-4370-8D96-FC3F9F8CFA09@btinternet.com> <4AA80D4B.9070102@hale-pohaku.net> <7ac27f4f0909091333r2ee4f5jf3558c8a7225a3d5@mail.gmail.com> <p06230901c6cdc3d25efd@10.1.16.129> <246526.13749.qm@web55905.mail.re3.yahoo.com> <p06230909c6cdf9326c8c@10.1.16.145> <6e74b3700909100134w7330a1b2sde08fe355918486e@mail.gmail.com>
Yes, it can, since it adheres to the micro 4/3 standard, and with the
right adapters, you can stick just about any lens ever made on that
class of machines, including cinema C-lens.
Since the camera is not shipping yet, who knows how good the PanyLeica
lens really is.
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 1:34 AM, Simon Ogilvie <simon.ogilvie at gmail.com>
wrote:
> I'd been wondering about the GF1 - can it take M lenses with an adaptor
> like
> the G1 can? ?Is it worth trying that or are the Pany/Leica lenses actually
> any good?
>
--
// richard m: richard @imagecraft.com
// w: http://www.imagecraft.com/pub/Portfolio09/ blog:
http://rfman.wordpress.com
// book: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/detail/745963
In reply to:
Message from msadat at gmail.com (mehrdad) ([Leica] leica x1 @ popflash)
Message from richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] leica x1 @ popflash)
Message from Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie) ([Leica] leica x1 @ popflash)
Message from dennis at hale-pohaku.net (Dennis) ([Leica] leica x1 @ popflash)
Message from richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] leica x1 @ popflash)
Message from h_arche at yahoo.com (H. Ball Arche) ([Leica] X1 might be ok)
Message from simon.ogilvie at gmail.com (Simon Ogilvie) ([Leica] X1 might be ok)