Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2009/09/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Fw: X1 might be ok
From: gregj_lorenzo at hotmail.com (Greg Lorenzo)
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 17:57:04 -0600
References: <440b792d0909082124o52a31b6p45706fbac43662b8@mail.gmail.com> <7ac27f4f0909082151h6e77f0b1wf0202ba128d0ce36@mail.gmail.com> <3A125937-39C6-4370-8D96-FC3F9F8CFA09@btinternet.com> <4AA80D4B.9070102@hale-pohaku.net> <7ac27f4f0909091333r2ee4f5jf3558c8a7225a3d5@mail.gmail.com> <p06230901c6cdc3d25efd@[10.1.16.129]> <321019.24987.qm@web55902.mail.re3.yahoo.com>
Harvey Arche writes in part:
> Does the build quality approach my IIIc? (I'm insisting on seeing the X1
> as having the Barnack heritage; the brochure says 'all metal'
> construction, but-)
No camera made by Leica, since the M2-R, approaches the build quality of a
LTM.
I'd hold on to the IIIc.
Greg Lorenzo
Calgary, Canada
_________________________________________________________________
Windows Live: Make it easier for your friends to see what you?re up to on
Facebook.
http://windowslive.com/Campaign/SocialNetworking?ocid=PID23285::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:SI_SB_facebook:082009
In reply to:
Message from msadat at gmail.com (mehrdad) ([Leica] leica x1 @ popflash)
Message from richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] leica x1 @ popflash)
Message from Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie) ([Leica] leica x1 @ popflash)
Message from dennis at hale-pohaku.net (Dennis) ([Leica] leica x1 @ popflash)
Message from richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] leica x1 @ popflash)
Message from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] leica x1 @ popflash)
Message from h_arche at yahoo.com (H. Ball Arche) ([Leica] Fw: X1 might be ok)