Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/09/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]That certainly "seems" to be the case. The medium format CCD backs don't "seem" to deliver high ISO performance either. It "seems" that the trade off is fine detail in the lower ISO speeds. Regards, George Lottermoser george at imagist.com http://www.imagist.com http://www.imagist.com/blog http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist On Sep 9, 2009, at 12:10 PM, Chris Williams wrote: > I'm not going to guess or want to, but the M9 has a CCD and the > other high iso kings use CMOS, the results are not going to be the > same. > > Chris > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michiel Fokkema" > Subject: Re: [Leica] M9 sample ISO 1600 > > >> Yeah, >> I'd expect it to be as good as the 5d2. Same sensor size and less >> pixels. I don't get it why it isn't better. >> Dpreview says it has one stop advantage in noise over the M8. >> The M9 has however the built in database for lenses. No coding >> needed anymore! That's great. >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> Michiel Fokkema >> >> Henning Wulff wrote: >>> OOPS!!! >>> >>> Should be: >>> >>> http://www.dpreview.com/gallery/photo.aspx? >>> gallery=leicam9_preview&photo=5 >>> >>> >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> ---- >>> >>> >>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: >>> 270.13.87/2356 - Release Date: 09/09/09 06:53:00 >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information