Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/09/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I do not think they are big, I think the M8 is impressively small considering what is in there. Film cameras are almost empty and the film etc space tiny. I think modern digi cameras are impressively small. Frank On 2 Sep 2009, at 13:47, Dante Stella <dstella1 at ameritech.net> wrote: > Assuming that the AF speed obviates the need for zone focusing M43 > lenses, and except for the in-lens IS, this looks a bit more > promising than the E-P1. But why are these cameras so big? The > height and depth of the body look like they're almost the same as an > M8, and this is before you put an EVF on it. > > On Sep 2, 2009, at 8:08 AM, Chris Williams wrote: > >> Does Leica make micro Red Dots to disguise the camera? >> >> Developed from my iHolga >> >> >> On Sep 2, 2009, at 6:54 AM, Kyle Cassidy <kcassidy at asc.upenn.edu> >> wrote: >> >>> The new Micro 4:3 GF1 is a bit more leica looking than a lot of >>> other things i've seen -- with the pancake lens it's looking >>> pretty attractive as the camera to go in my old M-Classic bag.... >>> >>> http://www.dpreview.com/news/0909/09090204panasonicdmcgf1.asp >>> >>> >>> http://www.dpreview.com/news/0909/09090203panasonic20mm.asp >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Leica Users Group. >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information